Back in the day, when late Master Distiller Booker Noe would walk through the warehouses looking for ‘honey barrels,’ he’d look for shiny ones. Why shiny? Distillery warehouse workers would occasionally sneak a sip from barrels. As they thieved some whiskey, they’d rub up against the barrel and remove the dust… hence shiny barrels. The shinier the barrel, the more its contents had been sampled by the warehouse workers. It’s one of the ways Noe knew which barrels to look at first when batching together his namesake whiskey. Most of those barrels were found in the center of the warehouses.
“Shiny Barrel Batch” is 6 years, 5 months, and a day old and bottled at cask strength – 124 proof.
After the previous batch being dominated by its nutty quality, Booker’s has shifted coarse back to a balanced bourbon with this batch. The nose features hints of vanilla bean, red fruit, caramel corn, and a bit of oak. The entry is a bit fiery at first, but calms slightly and presents notes of buttered corn, vanilla cream, and caramel. Red fruit and tobacco leaf appear in the mid-palate alongside some oak spice and Beam’s roasted peanut note. The latter is presented in its usual supporting nature as opposed to dominating. The finish is long with lingering hints of spiced caramel and oak.
I’m happy to report Booker’s “Shiny Barrel Batch” is more balanced than the previous batch. It’s classic Booker’s – big, bold, boisterous, flavorful, and balanced. Recommended! 8/10
Thanks to Booker’s for the sample. As always, all thoughts and opinions are my own.
Four of us tried Bookers 2019-2 , we were expecting something good. What I tasted was confirmed by the looks on the faces of the other drinkers, this stuff is awful. It wasn’t the proof, we were all fine with high octaine, it was the flavor. Hard to describe, the edges were ok, but they surrounded an off taste that overwhelmed, and none of us could describe exactly what we tasted, we were all left shaking our heads; especially me, I bought the bottle.
Interesting. I found 2019-01 to be off, but 2019-02 to be more along the line of classic Booker’s.